Introduction
This summary tells us what works in strengthening family wellbeing and community
cohesion through the role of schools and extended services. It is based on a rapid
review of the research literature involving systematic searching. It summarises
the best available evidence that will help service providers to improve services
and, ultimately, outcomes for children, young people and their families.
The Institute of Education carried out the review on behalf of the Centre for Excellence
and Outcomes in Children and Young People’s Services (C4EO). The National Foundation
for Educational Research (NFER) compiled the data.
Key messages
- There needs to be a holistic approach to securing community cohesion and family
wellbeing, involving all service providers working together.
- Children’s Trusts have an important role in encouraging engagement and take-up in
schools by sharing good practice, and providing support and training to motivate
schools that have made less progress in providing extended services.
- The decision on what services should be provided by extended schools needs to involve
community groups and parents so that services are appropriate and meet the real
needs of the community.
- Sustainable long-term provision of services that integrate with existing provision
is most successful. The benefits of short-term projects are quickly eroded.
- Clear communication is important to building trusting relationships between families,
support agencies and the wider community. Professionals must have the skills to
build positive relationships with diverse groups who may hold different values and
expectations.
- Engaging parents in supporting learning in the home is the most successful way of
raising student achievement and is where schools should focus their efforts in supporting
parents.
- Targeted support during early years and at transition points in school can make
significant differences to children’s learning and aspirations. Key effects are
improved behaviour, better learning outcomes and fewer exclusions.
Who are the key stakeholders?
Children and young people
Children and young people’s views are influenced by factors beyond school. Community
cohesion strategies need to operate at multiple levels, not just at school, and
children need to have time to explore and reflect on their experiences.
Children with deeper prejudiced attitudes before an intervention are least likely
to report a change in their views, and in some cases, their attitudes harden. It
is, therefore, important that the local situation is taken into account when developing
a cohesion strategy.
Local authorities
Local authorities need to develop and maintain trusting relationships between different
agencies and the communities they serve. Local authority community cohesion officers
have an important role in advising schools and other children’s services on how
best to make an effective contribution.
Schools and extended services
Schools and extended services can contribute to cohesion through linking projects
with other schools, using the curriculum to promote shared values and offering extended
services to parents and the wider local community so that parent and family engagement
is at the centre of their developmental activity. Successful approaches for engagement
with parents and families take into account the specific needs of the local community.
Schools should offer themselves as a base for community activities out of school
hours and during holidays to promote engagement with the wider community.
School leaders and teachers
School leaders and teachers must develop good two-way communication with parents.
School staff need training so that they feel confident and communicate well with
all groups in the school’s local community.
Teachers need to be convinced of the value of cohesion projects, such as linking
projects with other schools, so that projects are integrated into wider classroom
work and are successful. It is also important that schools listen to young people,
for instance via feedback from school councils and from regular school questionnaires.
School governors
School governors need to be representative of the local population, in terms of
class and ethnicity. A range of strategies can increase participation, including
a dedicated governor recruitment officer, advertising in the local press and allowances
for childcare and other costs.
Parents and carers
Parents and carers need to be involved with the school, for instance as mentors
and with the services on offer to feel that they have a valuable contribution to
make. Resistance from parents may be misunderstood as a lack of interest rather
than originating from a lack of time or of confidence.
Families most at risk from lack of engagement should work with one person who can
link them to the range of services on offer. A trusted point of contact helps those
families that are reluctant to engage due to previous experiences of services, especially
if they have found them fragmented. The use of parent support advisors by schools
has proved to be very successful for these reasons.
Children’s Trusts
Children’s Trusts need to provide schools with good data about their local communities
so that decisions on which services to provide are not based only on schools’ limited
interactions with families.
What data is available to inform the way forward?
The main data sources are the DCSF (on educational attainment and attendance and
progression outcomes) and a number of different national cohort studies and cross-sectional
ad hoc surveys (on attitudes and perceptions). The data provides indications of
the extent of community diversity (as represented by pupil backgrounds, disability
and mental health).
The cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys are sources of information on perceptions
of community cohesion and engagement. There is no clear measure of the national,
regional or local extent of parental involvement.
The evidence base
The evidence relating to family and parental support is wide ranging. However, there
are some weaknesses and there is a need for:
- more research to formally evaluate action to promote community cohesion, particularly
on aspects of class, gender, sexuality and age
- more research on how schools are involved at a strategic level in working with other
agencies to promote community cohesion, the wider community impact of schools’ actions,
and the impact of school admission policies on community cohesion
- more empirical studies of family/parental engagement, particularly explicit examples
of how to increase achievement and attainment of young people
- greater distinction between different groups of families and parents, as they tend
to be regarded as a homogenous group.